AI LLM Penetration Testing | VeerAI

Hackers are already 
testing your AI. 
Are you?

Traditional pentests don’t speak fluent prompt injection. Ours do.

A conventional web or network test won’t catch the failures that matter most in an AI app. Prompt injection, embedding inversion and excessive agency are semantic and behavioural attacks — not the configuration bugs a classic pentest hunts for. They need a purpose-built methodology, an isolated testbed, and testers who understand how models and agents actually work.

We test the AI layer
 

Prompt injection, jailbreaks, data egress, system-prompt leakage, RAG poisoning, 
excessive agency — the 
semantic attack surface.

And the classic layer
 

The API, web front-end and cloud stack behind your AI remain exposed to the OWASP Web Top 10. We 
cover both, so nothing slips between the cracks.

Your data never leaves

The offensive phase runs against an isolated testbed. We don’t send your data to third-party model providers to test it.

Every engagement maps to the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025)

A recognised framework your auditors accept and your board understands — cross-referenced to MITRE ATLAS and scored for prioritisation.

LLM04

 

Data & Model Poisoning

LLM06

 

Excessive Agency

LLM10

 

Unbounded Consumption

LLM08

 

Vector & Embedding Weaknesses

LLM02

 

Sensitive Information Disclosure

LLM09

 

Misinformation

LLM07

 

System Prompt Leakage

LLM05

 

Improper Output Handling

 

Supply Chain

LLM03

 

Prompt Injection

LLM01

The standard we test to

Built for how your AI is really deployed

LLM & GenAI applications

Customer chatbots, internal copilots and product-
embedded assistants — prompt injection, output 
handling and data egress under real attack.

RAG & Vector stores

Retrieval poisoning, embedding inversion and cross-
tenant leakage in the pipeline that feeds your model.

AI red teaming

Jailbreaks, guardrail bypass and multi-turn manipulation — adversarial testing of safety and misuse, not just 
single prompts.

Model & Supply chain

Adversarial ML (evasion, extraction, inversion) plus 
model, plugin and MCP-server provenance and poisoning.

What We Actually Test

Our Methodology

A documented process — not a one-off prompt-poking session

1. Scope & rules of engagement: Define scope, inventory AI, and prepare testing.
2. AI threat modeling: Identify threats and map the AI attack surface.
3. Automated probing: Run automated tests across AI attack vectors.
4. Manual exploitation & chaining: Simulate advanced attacks and validate exploits.
5. Score & map to your controls: Score risks and align with compliance controls.
6. Report, remediate & free retest: Deliver findings, recommend fixes, and retest.

What lands on your desk

A pentest your 
auditor accepts — and your board understands

Two reports in one: a plain-English executive summary that maps findings to business and compliance risk, and a technical report with a reproducible proof-of-concept and architecture-specific fix for every issue.

           EVERY ENGAGEMENT INCLUDES

1. OWASP LLM Top 10 + MITRE ATLAS coverage

2. Reproducible PoC for every finding

3. Executive + technical reports

4. Mapping to ISO 42001 / EU AI Act controls

5. Free unlimited retesting of fixes

Find out what your AI does under attack — 
on your terms, not an attacker’s.

Book a 45-minute scoping call. We’ll define the attack surface, agree the rules of engagement and give you a straight quote.

Contact Us

Info@ai-eurocompliance.com

🏢 Headquarters: Germany

 

Logo
AI Governance • ISO 42001 
AI Security • Compliance

©Copyright 2026. All rights reserved.

Information icon

Wir benötigen Ihre Zustimmung zum Laden der Übersetzungen

Wir nutzen einen Drittanbieter-Service, um den Inhalt der Website zu übersetzen, der möglicherweise Daten über Ihre Aktivitäten sammelt. Bitte überprüfen Sie die Details in der Datenschutzerklärung und akzeptieren Sie den Dienst, um die Übersetzungen zu sehen.